Aneel and its appeal

Above: The research team will manufacture the pellets in the Fuel Cycle and Materials Laboratory at Texas A&M (Photo credit: Justin Baetge/ Texas A&M Engineering)

ANEEL FUEL WILL COMBINE THORIUM and high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU), which the developers say will address issues including cost, safety, proliferation and waste management. It is being developed for existing pressurised heavy water reactors (PHWRs), or Candu-type units, which typically use natural uranium oxide as fuel. There are currently 49 operating PHWR or Candu reactors in seven countries — Canada, Argentina, India, China South Korea, Pakistan and Romania.

Texas A&M has already started manufacturing the Aneel fuel pellets at its Nuclear Engineering and Science Center (NESC), following the strict guidelines and quality assurance requirements of the DOE and US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). It will send fabricated Aneel fuel pellets to Idaho National Laboratory (INL), which will conduct high burnup irradiation testing of the fuel in the Advanced Test Reactor’s high-flux irradiation rig. This will be followed by post-irradiation examination in INL’s hot cell facility and then fuel qualification.

Irradiation and testing is scheduled for 2021 and the aim is to bring the product to market in 2024, Mehul Shah, founder and CEO of Clean Core Thorium Energy told NEI. CCTE is in the process of exploring and identifying a target operating commercial utility partner for irradiation of lead test assemblies, he adds.

Fuel design and benefits

The team developing the new fuel feels it is beneficial to use existing reactor technology to minimise cost and avoid decades-long regulatory hurdles for deployment. As such the external dimensions of Aneel fuel are identical to the fuel currently used in PHWRs but with proprietary composition and configuration of the fuel inside, which will reach burnup of 55GWd/t.

“Cladding materials will be similar to those used in current Candu/PHWR but with different dimensions of CCTE IP to withstand high burnup,” Shah says.

He adds that using thorium as the main ingredient has many advantages.

It has a higher melting point and lower internal operating temperature, so thorium is inherently safer than uranium, making a core meltdown less likely.

The higher fuel burnup possible using Aneel also means the volume of waste is reduced substantially.

Additionally, higher fuel burnup, which means more of the uranium and plutonium are burned to generate power, results in an end product that is “significantly denatured, reducing the proliferation risk associated with the used fuel.”

Finally, thorium is found more abundantly than uranium on Earth and can be extracted readily from seawater.

Emerging opportunity

“With this collaboration, Aneel-fuelled PHWRs/Candus could provide abundant, safe and clean energy in order to build a path to development and dignity for emerging nations,” says Shah.

The team says that by delivering optimal performance in existing heavy water reactor designs with proven competitive performance, the new Aneel fuel breaks barriers for fuel utilisation, safety and proliferation resistance. That improved performance lowers the hurdles to deploy nuclear energy. When used in small heavy water reactors, Aneel fuel is “ideal for deployment to emerging countries where the need for additional clean energy is most urgent,” it adds.

Why is the US developing nuclear fuel for PHWR reactors when it has no such units in operation? It is part of the country’s current drive to be a world leader in HALEU production.

“In our case, since Aneel uses Th-HALEU fuel, it is an opportunity for the US to be a global fuel supplier for Aneel-fuelled Candu/PHWR globally,” says Shah.

And while the Aneel fuel would give maximum advantage in PHWRs/Candu units, in principle such thorium-based fuel concepts can be adopted for existing light water reactors or the small modular reactors (SMRs) now under development.